For Your Eyes Only

  • 1981


MOVIE IS elegant perpetual enjoyable outlandish spectacular
Close Video

59 %
74 % Fresh
$ 54 Million
See Where to Watch For Your Eyes Only
Positive Reviews 21
Negative reviews 10
Average Rating 3.2/5
elegant perpetual enjoyable outlandish spectacular

  • All
  • Positive
  • Negative
2.5
For Your Eyes Only is a competent James Bond thriller, well crafted, a respectable product from the 007 production line.But its no more than that. Rogerebert
2.0
It gets by as undemanding entertainment for the fans, with some particularly excellent underwater cinematography and action sequences. Common Sense Media
4.5
One of the most thoroughly enjoyable of the 12 Bond pix despite fact that many of the usual ingredients in the successful 007 formula are missing. Variety
0.5
Look, Ma, no plot and poor dialogue, and Moore really is old enough to be the uncle of those girls. Time Out
2.0
This is a Bond waiting for something inspired to push it over the top.
2.0
In a James Bond movie, a little ambiguity of this sort is much too much. The New York Times
2.0
Personal vengeance is a striking theme for this franchise, but it doesnt sit well.
4.0
From the opening scene of Bond trapped in a pilot less helicopter to the closing scenes where he must survive being dragged through shark invested wat .. Spirituality And Practice
2.0
For Your Eyes Only ditches its usual expensive sets and high tech gadgetry and supervillain, and replaces it with stunts, its usual muddled plot line .. Sover
3.8
By the end of the 80s, Bond would be viewed as something of a relic, but at least the decade opened with an enjoyable outing. ReelViews
3.1
This is despite a welcome attempt to echo the less flashy sensibilities of the Sean Connery era, as the movie consistently eschews over the top gadget .. Reel Film Reviews
3.0
Bond veteran John Glen ensures that the set pieces are spectacular enough and thankfully plays down the gadgetry. Radio Times
2.5
How one misses Goldfinger and the early Bond films in which the gadgets had more style and imagination. Internet Reviews
4.5
For Your Eyes Only is still the most thrilling entry in Roger Moores tenure. A great song, a charming ally, a creepy henchman, a terrific Bond Girl, a .. Film Inquiry
3.0
Topped with a vertiginous mountain climbing finale, For Your Eyes Only manages to pack in the spectacle whilst dispensing with the silliness that had .. Bbc
1.5
Moore is merely the best oiled cog in this perpetual motion machine. Time
3.0
Spider Man: Far From Home release date, cast, trailer, and everything else you need to know Feature Your first look at the Spider Man: Far From Home p .. Total Film
4.0
Following the crazy over the top spectacle that was Moonraker, the Bond franchise took a back to basics approach with the enjoyable no frills adventur .. Lyles Movie Files
3.8
The scene is both thrilling in its action and absurdly comical, an odd way to start the otherwise carefully balanced Bond outing. Groucho Reviews
4.4
Very pleasant, unforced, throwaway entertainment, though Moore is clearly getting a mite too old for all this. Movies Tv Guide
4.4
This is the closest Moore ever came to the world weary, battle hardened Bond of the books. Three Movie Buffs
4.0
Eyes also shows poor form by offering no end credits dedication.Its almost as if the franchise couldnt be bothered to let something as pesky as real l .. The Filmy Ap
4.0
a way to make even Moores breezy quipping work in a more sober vein. Its serious without sacrificing escapist fun. Antagony & Ecstasy
4.5
If ever a Bond film could be described as understated, this is the one. Film 4
4.5
Roger Moore has crumpled his comic strip good looks into something approaching world weariness, and the newfound maturity in his expression is reflect .. Chicago Reader
3.5
Most of the outlandish silliness of a few other Bond issues is mercifully absent, replaced by a greater emphasis on believable thrills. The result is .. Movie Metropolis
4.0
After 20 years, though, its comforting to have 007 still stylishly triumphant and making the theaters safe for entertainment. People
2.0
Roger Moore has always been my least favorite James Bond, and For Your Eyes Only is possibly the worst of Moores Bond films. Net Flix
2.0
The picture cant quite shake off the increasingly silly legacy which had mired the franchise in the Roger Moore era. Patrick Nabarro
3.0
She doesnt make any telling contribution to the film other than to be this ditzy girl.
4.0
Hats off to the writers for creating a Bond girl who is actually a capable and strong willed women, and who Bond doesnt piss about with. hoganreviews.co.uk
3.8
Gone are the big gadgets and huge set pieces. What we get instead are some decent car chases, fist fights, and practical stunts. The result is a prett .. Film Geek Central
1.5
For Your Eyes Only, however, looks like the work of people too smug in the belief theyve got a good thing going to bother to make it interesting. It o .. Boston Globe



See Where to Watch For Your Eyes Only