Goldfinger

  • 1964


MOVIE IS terrible ultimate fantastic invincible enjoyable
Close Video

88 %
96 % Certified Fresh
$ 51 Million
Award Winner
See Where to Watch Goldfinger
Positive Reviews 31
Negative reviews 6
Average Rating 3.8/5
terrible ultimate fantastic invincible enjoyable

  • All
  • Positive
  • Negative
5.0
If it is not a great film, it is a great entertainment, and contains all the elements of the Bond formula that would work again and again. Rogerebert
4.0
For these reasons, this film truly serves as the template of all subsequent Bond films. Common Sense Media
1.5
Theres not the least sign of staleness in this third sample of the Bond 007 formula. Variety
3.0
Presented here in a newly restored digital print, it should look especially swish on the big screen. Time Out
2.0
Two words: Pussy Galore.Shes obviously in this film to distract the audience from the horrifying truth: Bond saves the world by doing absolutely nothi ..
4.5
Every now and again the narrative insists on gently sending itself up, as if assuring us that the film is perfectly aware of its fundamental absurdity .. Telegraph
5.0
Farty critics may scoff, but Goldfinger should take its place among the greats.
5.0
Its phenomenal!.A rare case in film history that a series projecting the same character, with the same star, improves as it goes along. Ny Daily News
2.0
Froebe and Sakata make for oversized fun villains, the fast pace keeps the hokum moving along with little reason to give the story much thought and Co .. Sover
4.4
The level of excitement in Goldfinger is up a notch from its predecessors. ReelViews
3.0
This 1964 entry is the most enjoyable of the James Bond thrillers starring Sean Conneryperhaps because its the most comic and cartoony in look as well .. Chicago Reader
3.8
More than Dr. No or From Russia With Love, Goldfinger generally feels like a template for the Bond movie formula as the film possess virtually all of .. Reel Film Reviews
4.5
Its not quite the perfect film many claim it to be, but it is a perfect representation of what Bond is, and you would be hard pressed to identify a fi .. Film Inquiry
4.0
As the stakes increase, so does the wicked tinge of humour to Bonds moments of peril. Bbc
1.5
A bit much Yes, but its meant to be. Like Doctor No and From Russia with Love, the two previous Bond bombshells, this picture is a thriller exuberantl .. Time
4.8
The films final act fully raises the stakes for the franchise and really delivers a satisfying conclusion and a fitting fate for Bonds most ingenious .. Lyles Movie Files
3.0
Exotic set pieces would be epic in scale.The series signature nuanced tone, straddling dualities such as dry humor and outrageous danger, would be mor .. Coles Mithey
3.5
Bond is ordered to remain cold and objective but disobeys handsomely, seducing and bedding almost every woman in the film.
5.0
The one that all other Bond films must live up to, and the only one of the films that surpasses the book upon which it is based.This is the one that k .. Three Movie Buffs
5.0
This is the third, tightest and wildest script Sean Connery, as the invincible agent, has yet had on the screen. Cleve Land
1.5
... what they give us in Goldfinger is an excess of science fiction fun, a mess of mechanical melodrama and a minimum of bedroom farce. Ny Times
4.0
You Only Live Twenty Thrice is Nick Rogers look back at the James Bond films.Each Friday until the release of the 23rd official Bond film, Skyfall, Ni .. The Filmy Ap
4.5
Theres a very special, and weird, purity about the Bond formula as it is presented here: all the excess is in place but still reined in by some last m .. Antagony & Ecstasy
3.8
So Goldfinger is sometimes very enjoyable, but its too uneven for me to call it a masterpiece. Montreal Film Journal
5.0
This is the only Bond film AFI would honor among its most thrilling films in 2001. Solzy At The Movies
5.0
For the first time Connery was truly relaxed and drove the Aston Martin DB5, that years must have toy for every boy in the land. Film Guardian
4.0
Well, 007, you grumpy old square: in those days, action movies were addressed to an older generation. Film Guardian
4.0
These Bond capers were the prototypes and set the gold standard for dozens of fantasy thrillers that followed. Movie Metropolis
4.0
The plot really does rattle on by, and there isnt one wasted scene. Patrick Nabarro
3.0
Goldfinger (1964) is the third entry in the long running series of Bond films, the first of four films directed by Guy Hamilton, and the first officia .. Film Site
4.5
The ultimate measure of Goldfingers sustained success is in how much its become part of our shared filmic culture irrespective of whether folks have e .. Zaki's Corner
4.5
By all means, Goldfinger placed as the fourth best Bond film does not mean its terrible.
4.0
Goldfinger is a classic, no doubt. It does have some flaws in the third quarter of the film, but it pulls it back to become a fun, relaxing watch. hoganreviews.co.uk
3.8
GOLDFINGER, for me, isnt the perfect Bond movie (though it does have all the elements to be perfect), but its still a fun, corny time. Definition of a .. Film Geek Central
5.0
Goldfinger really is a dazzling object lesson in the principle that nothing succeeds like excess. Screen Online Org Uk
1.5
... so cleverly directed at breakneck speed by Guy Hamilton that patrons scarcely have time to catch their breath between the fantastic dangers, killi .. Boxoffice Magazine
5.0
The iconic James Bond movie, this third entry into the franchise is rightly heralded for offering the perfect blend of action, adventure, gunplay, fis .. Filmcritic.com



See Where to Watch Goldfinger