Eye for an Eye

  • 1996


MOVIE IS egregious unsentimental unnerving
Close Video

44 %
8 % Rotten
$ 12 Million
See Where to Watch Eye for an Eye
Positive Reviews 2
Negative reviews 7
Average Rating 2.0/5
egregious unsentimental unnerving

  • All
  • Positive
  • Negative
1.3
This movie is intellectually corrupt because it deliberately avoids dealing with the issues it raises. Rogerebert
2.5
It makes its case for vigilante revenge so pat one has nothing to think over but accept its offensive findings. Sover
1.0
If you thought Schlesingers Pacific Heights was egregious, you aint seen nothin yet; do yourself a favor and see Dead Man Walking instead. Chicago Reader
2.0
Sadly, with formula too often favoured to invention and its social message lost in histrionics, the potency of the material fizzles out. Empire
2.5
The grief portion of the film is perhaps the strongest calling card, in terms of layered drama. Sf Gate
4.0
Seeking justice, with a vengeance JOHN SCHLESINGER made Midnight Cowboy and Sunday, Bloody Sunday, but it is the ferocity and narrative edge of his Ma .. Sf Gate
1.3
Those expecting a straight action/horror vehicle (which the ads are making it out to be) will be disappointed. Mr Brown Movies
1.9
Unsentimental, non glamorized, and unclouded by the usual overlay of rose colored nostalgia, this is a raw but rewarding motion picture. ReelViews
1.3
Starring Sally Field, Ed Harris, Keifer Sutherland This film is on the Worst of 1996 list.Eye for an Eye Opened: January 12, 1996 | Rated: R I cant te .. Spliced Wire
1.9
By showing this in graphic, R rated terms (albeit with quick, MTV style edits), the scenes power is diluted and the films exploitative tendencies are .. Deseret News
3.5
Back to Eye for an Eye Back to the Press Room Copyright 1994 2008 Film Scouts LLC Created, produced, and published by Film Scouts LLC Film Scouts is a .. Film Scouts



See Where to Watch Eye for an Eye