Stay Hungry

  • 1976


MOVIE IS predictable emotional amusing interesting freewheeling
Close Video

40 %
75 % Fresh
$ 24 Million
Award Winner
See Where to Watch Stay Hungry
Positive Reviews 8
Negative reviews 2
Average Rating 3.3/5
predictable emotional amusing interesting freewheeling

  • All
  • Positive
  • Negative
3.8
Advertisement The movie doesnt concern itself very much with plot; like Rafelsons Five Easy Pieces and the underrated The King of Marvin Gardens, it i .. Rogerebert
4.5
It has its slack spells, but Rafelsons sure feel for the inexpressible subtleties of emotional relationships is evident throughout. Time Out
3.0
In Saul Bellows novel The Adventures of Augie March, the picaresque hero says of himself: I touched all sides, and nobody knew where I belonged.I had .. Spirituality And Practice
3.1
Using his expected freewheeling style, Rafelson does a nice job of establishing this world as more than just a haven for quirky characters. Reel Film Reviews
4.0
Totally laid back, this all seems pointlessly unstructured, until you realise thats the way its supposed to be: an endearing look at barbell bums who .. Radio Times
3.8
Filled with interesting characters and strong performances, STAY HUNGRY not only makes its point about class prejudice, but presents a detailed portra .. Movies Tv Guide
2.5
It just seems that way when it pretends to be more eccentric than it is and to have more on its mind than it actually does. Ny Times
3.0
Very much a product of its time, Stay Hungry is indulgent and only sporadically amusing, but kept afloat by a typically charming Jeff Bridges. Film 4
1.5
Its difficult to ascertain what Bob Rafelson had in mind (or whether he lost it completely) when he made Stay Hungry. Associated Press
1.5
The characters seem to drift from one incident to another without involving the viewer much at all. Los Angeles Free Press
4.5
There is nothing predictable about Stay Hunrgry, nothing formula, nothing boring. Los Angeles Free Press



See Where to Watch Stay Hungry