Transporter 2

  • 2005


MOVIE IS entertaining original ridiculous serious ludicrous
Close Video

53 %
51 % Rotten
$ 89 Million
See Where to Watch Transporter 2
Positive Reviews 43
Negative reviews 24
Average Rating 2.6/5
entertaining original ridiculous serious ludicrous

  • All
  • Positive
  • Negative
1.5
Much like a James Bond movie, only more playful and entertaining than that series has managed in many years, Transporter 2 isnt a continuation of the .. Av Club
3.0
The greatest thing about the movie is Statham, a charismatic silent, deadly type who deserves to take the wheel behind a better franchise. EW
3.8
Either Transporter 2 is wall to wall with absurd action, or its not a sequel to Transporter. Rogerebert
1.5
Poor Frank doesnt even get the girl ones married, and the other, the psychopathic Lola, is torn between her trigger finger and the Tae Bo happy Gianni .. Austin Chronicle
1.9
The Transporter 2 is a martial arts obsessed action movie inadvertently reconceived as cartoonish parody.
3.0
Get this guy into a good movie and youll have something really cool.
3.0
Michel Julienne providessome excellent stunts for the heros armoured, gravity defying BMW, which makesthe Batmobile look like a tricycle. Screen Daily
2.0
While some might complain that this sequel to the Luc Besson scripted, Cory Yuen helmed 2002 smash sleeper is simply too outrageous to believe, that s ..
3.5
Though both Transporter films are driven by the same empty headed video game slickness, Transporter 2 surpasses its less focused predecessor on almost .. The New York Times
1.9
The Transporter films are pure garbage; ones that dont quite reach the bottom of the chute since the XXX flicks will cushion their fall. E Film Critic
3.5
A vehicle for Statham to drive fast cars and beat the hell out of people, TRANSPORTER 2 provides a much needed fix for action fans stuck in the late s .. E Film Critic
3.0
Anything else is filler, plain and simple.And judging this sequel based solely upon its eclectic array of action sequences, well, lets just say you ma .. E Film Critic
2.5
But the film still delivers plenty of action and a few laughs, while bringing back underrated actor Jason Statham at his brooding best. San Francisco Chronicle
3.0
As such, Transporter 2 is the very definition of a guilty pleasure.
3.0
The action is often stupid, but also entertaining and even occasionally striking. Cinema Blend
3.0
If you actually go into this picture attempting to find any common sense in its plotline, you might want to have your head examined afterwards... JoBlo
2.0
In this second lap the brainless busyness and gaudy excess amount to utter overkill...nothing more than pointless speed and empty action. One Guys Opinion
2.8
Its best quality is that theres no pretensions in its ridiculous cartoonish adventure story that is slickly drawn up as if it were a video game. Sover
3.1
Unsentimental, non glamorized, and unclouded by the usual overlay of rose colored nostalgia, this is a raw but rewarding motion picture. ReelViews
3.8
Its a lean, perfectly paced, unpretentious good time; its what popcorn movies ought to be. Combust Ible Celluloid
3.1
Although not without its entertaining moments, the result is so over the top that well never again be able to look at Denzel Washington and Dakota Fan .. Usa Today
3.1
Its clear, however, that The Transporter: Refueled staves off total worthlessness thanks to a few admittedly compelling action sequences, with directo .. Reel Film Reviews
3.0
Basically, theres not enough action in this movie that is essentially all about action. Eric Ds Nider
2.5
Its impossible to enjoy even the most inventive action sequence without any context. Shadows On The Wall
2.0
If The Transporter was mindless fun, this sequel suggests there can be an IQ less than zero. Cs Monitor
3.0
Transporter 2 softens the formula a bit, but still delivers the kind of vivid, pounding action that B movie fans crave. Film Journal International ..
2.5
But, Franks impossible ditching of a bomb aside, the movie lacks the spectacular sense of the ridiculous that made its predecessor so special. Boston
3.5
New York Times critic Laura Kern wrote that the film surpasses its less focused predecessor on almost every level. Smh
1.9
Supercharged by abnormally warm waters in the Gulf of Mexico, Hurricane Michael slammed into the Florida Panhandle on Wednesday with potentially catas .. Star Tribune
3.8
A look at the long day in the busy life of a Toronto councillor In the face of a surprise cut to the number of wards and councillors proposed by the p .. Toronto Star
3.5
Is a lot of fun, and I enjoyed it in all its ludicrous devices, and idiocy... Cinema Crazed
3.0
Its not a bad sequel, but the original was, well, original. There are some overplayed elements, but the action is snappy and the danger is credible.
3.0
Undemanding punters are guaranteed 90 minutes of dopey, derivative and gloriously disposable entertainment. Bbc
2.5
Watching 88 minutes of almost nonstop, well choreographed car chases, stunts, gunplay and hand to hand combat at least gives the target audience what .. The Movie Boy
4.3
All youll need to do is sit back, embrace the absurd craziness and enjoy the ride. Lyles Movie Files
3.0
When the spectacle turns ridiculous, the movie just becomes another big screen video game. Seattle Pi
3.5
If you look at it as a serious action piece, it is truly imbecilic. Tony Medley
1.3
Transporter 2, however, is the exact opposite. Instead of being fun its just dumb, and no amount of nicely staged fight scenes or unusual camera moves .. Movie Freak
2.0
Still, most of it harks back to 90s action films while Cannons movie goes further back to the 80s for its rather bland car chases and fight sequences ..
0.6
Few bad movies are more aggravating than a sequel that betrays everything which made its predecessor entertaining. Spliced Wire
1.9
A bigger, sillier plot; too many CG special effects; and not nearly enough straightforward action Movie Habit
1.3
Look, the real wonder of WW84 is that this maybe isnt the worst thing about it. Film Freak Central
3.0
is for the most part exciting and very watchable, as is Statham, an understated hero who looks good in black. Boxoffice Magazine
3.0
From bang up beginning to blow up ending, this trip is clearly just good escapist fun. E Online
4.5
This ridiculously entertaining sequel is that rare part deux that leaves you hankering for part trois. La Weekly
2.5
Fans of the first Transporter shouldnt be disappointed with this sequel. Three Movie Buffs
3.1
As with the first, just dont expect anything close to a waterproof plot and youll be in the right frame of mind.The film delivers in the action depart .. Ross Anthony
1.9
Sadly, the edit happy direction by Louis Leterrier doesnt give you much of an idea of whats going on. Big Picture Big Sound
3.1
stomping through each scene wearing his Blues Brothers suit and a scowl, Statham has a very commanding screen presence Waffle Movies
2.0
Its best quality is that theres no pretensions in its ridiculous cartoonish adventure story that is slickly drawn up as if it were a video game. Dennis Schwartz Reviews
3.0
You will be able to save yourself from getting disappointed of watching nothing but a lame movie. Window To The Movies
1.9
An otherwise cruddy looking assemblage of action sequel clichs that benefits from Franks dry cleaned monosyllabic intensity but suffers from just abou .. Chron
0.5
The Transporter 2 is an absolutely absurd, silly and rather illogical action film. It also proves to be quite entertaining. Bowling Green Daily News
3.0
Whats left is rickety and fake, a sad failure to capitalize on some potentially enjoyable ideas. Flip Side Archive
2.5
Transporter 2 is so lightweight and frivolous, it makes one of Roger Moores Bond epics look like Crime and Punishment. Movie Metropolis
2.5
I dont mind exaggerated action sequences (in fact, I kind of like them) but Transporter 2 doesnt surround them with anything else. Aisle Seat
2.5
We want you to be happy!.What if I do a mailing and get returned mail Movie Eye
0.5
The scene involving a bomb planted on the bottom of Martins Audi A8 is bound to provoke an astonished gasp of disbelief from even the most action movi .. IGN Movies
3.0
Stylish thriller positing Jason Statham as a James Bond candidate. Compuserve
3.0
Despite some serious flaws, and issues with the plot, The Transporter 2 is a fun, silly, over the top, action film, that contain some truly inventive .. Eclipse Magazine
3.0
Fast paced sequel featuring British B movie action guy Jason Statham delivers what it promises, and not too much more. Net Flix
2.0
If you can make the leap alongside Bessons limitless imagination, this sequel tops the original Film Jerk
3.0
Game of Thrones: Sounds Like the Iron Bank Wont Be in the Final Season IGN News The representative of the Iron Bank, Tycho Nestoris played by Mark Gat .. Film Force Ign
3.0
Transporter 2 bursts with outrageous driving stunts, sublimely absurd fight scenes, and a sense of humor that ties it together. Reel Times: Reflections on ..
3.8
Later Statham arms himself with a fire hose for the pictures most gripping martial arts moments. Paloalto Online
3.8
There is a purity to Transporter 2 that even the most action averse moviegoer should appreciate. Suburban Chicago News
2.0
The only one who plays it straight is Statham, and his cool machismo borders on camp. Boston Phoenix
2.5
The ending sinks the enterprise (both literally and figuratively) with bad FX and subpar action movie one liners. Gost Dog
1.0
The evil plot is one of the dumbest ever in an action film...just stupid. Supercala.com
2.5
Like a cross between Man on Fire and Bad Boys 2, this demolition derby delivers eye popping action sequences that would make even the Roadrunner roll .. Miami Herald
3.0
Truth be told, they could have paraded an Unicorn in a clown suit across the screen and it wouldnt have been less unbelievable.. 3 Black Chicks
3.0
The movie is streamlined and of a singular, rowdy and rousingly delivered purpose. Hurrah for spectacle. Now Playing Mag
1.3
Is there a point at which an action film becomes so completely unrealistic, it crosses into the realm of fantasy and becomes something else Boston Herald
1.5
If youre at all picky about the laws of physics or if you liked the superior first film, I do not recommend seeing this film sober. Cinerina
3.8
The original Transporter was a surprise hit in 2002, and this second installment will not disappoint. Ask Men
2.0
There is absolutely nothing subtle about Transporter 2. But if you like your action movies to be ACTION movies, this one is fast paced, unapologetic e .. Access Atlanta
3.1
Transporter 2 is franchise hackwork, easily dismissed but adequately enjoyable. Seattle Times



See Where to Watch Transporter 2